Guh. Finally made it through Little Women. Well, almost. I’ve already had lectures on it and know how it ends, making the reading of it that much more of a chore. It’s continues to be a frustrating read for me as everything seems so unnatural and stiff, oddly even moreso in the second half where the story stops adhering to the “Pilgrim’s Progess” motif. I’ve read books like this before, where people “just don’t talk like that” or behave in such altruistic and didactic ways, but the levels to which Alcott seems to establish her characters through their moral lessons rather than focus more on actually making them human stops me in my tracks.
I really want to like Alcott. I do. I’ve read other stuff by her that, while verbose, kept my attention (“A Marble Woman” comes to mind). Unless someone can suggest to me a novel of hers that isn’t as maddening as Little Women, I’m putting her away for a loooong time (once this course is finished, anyway).
Kate Chopin, on the other hand, never ceases to impress. I’ve just finished “Athenaise” and I marveled at the subtlety of character and use of language. That’s not to say I didn’t have my problems with it, but they were more thematic than stylistic. I realize that Alcott’s book was meant for a different kind of audience, but good gravy, let your characters breathe a little bit. The literary choke-hold that Alcott keeps on her characters seems to prevent them from developing by any significant amount, reducing them cardboard cut-outs with absolutely no sense of mystery.
And since I mentioned Athenaise, there’s a scene in the story that gave me pause. At the beginning of the story, Athenaise runs back to her birth home after two months of marriage, feeling trapped and refusing to return to Cazeau and perform her wifely duties. Cazeau goes to fetch her and convinces her to go back with him, but as he follows her on horseback, is suddenly reminded of the time he and his father chased a slave who escaped from their Louisiana cotton plantation.
Now, hrmm. I think this is something I want to investigate further, and I’ll probably get the chance this term, and that’s this attempted link between slavery and marriage. In this scene, Chopin links them through Cazeau’s experience, perhaps showing that his supposed “ownership” of Athenaise is akin to his literal ownership of slaves. To me, in what little I know of the cultural context of the time, this link seems tenuous and problematic at best. I realize that Chopin is invoking the image of the slave symbolically, but it still gave me major pause to equate Athenaise’s experience to that of Black Gabe, although I find it incredibly fascinating.
Something to think about, I suppose.